financialservicesalert.com » This stock option plan was a big loser

This stock option plan was a big loser

by Jake Simms
Posted in: Compliance/Legislation, In this week's e-newletter, Latest News & Views

Some employees love stock options – but companies often stumble over the rules.

Case in point: Nortel Networks recently settled a court case brought by employees for $21.5 million because it didn’t warn them the company’s stock was risky. (The company ended up declaring bankruptcy.)

Your company clients may ask you about the ins and outs of stock options. Test your acumen by answering these three True or False statements:

1. Employees must receive hard-copy documentation that explains a stock option program’s terms and conditions.

2. Employers must wait at least six months after they grant stock options before receiving any value from the program.

3. When the stock option is based on performance, the determination must be made based on future performance, meeting previously established criteria, such as hours worked, efficiency or productivity.

Answers

1. False. The government doesn’t specify any particular mode of communication. But electronic communication should reasonably explain the terms and conditions in a way that employees will understand.

2. True. Employers must wait six months, except if: an employee dies, becomes disabled or retires. And if there’s a change in corporate ownership, the six-month rule can be waived as well.

3. False. This is just one option. Employers can also base the determination on the employee’s past performance. However – the determination is at the sole discretion of the employer.

Need more info on stock option plan-management? Click here.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply


advertisement

Whitepapers



advertisement

See what readers are saying...

  • Siegel has no Clue: Really Jeremy? 25% undervalued? When have you ever said they were expensive? Maybe you should check with GMO who has ...
  • David Pickett: QE3 might balance the budget while Congress does the political theater dance, some new sort of a Greek Tragedy!...
  • ethan: I'm not sure if I'd agree with going another round, but as you stated: "Unemployment is rising. Manufacturing is down. I...
  • Mark Aras: Let's try to NOT be creative by repeating last year's use of the term "qualitative easing" when everybody already unders...
  • e j boyson: Why buy Corporates @ 4% when once can buy decent Municipals @ 5%/6%/7%?...
  • Mark Thompson: In your article, do you mean to use the word quantitative as opposed to qualitative?...







a