financialservicesalert.com » These may be the junkiest of junk bonds

These may be the junkiest of junk bonds

by Jake Simms
Posted in: In this week's e-newletter, Investing Trends, Latest News & Views

Advisors generally like bonds because they’re “safe” – but here’s one bond market that’s looking pretty risky: 

Corporate bonds.

Investors are sinking trillions of dollars into buying corporations’ debt – and they’re investing for the lo-o-ong term.

Two examples:

  • Norfolk Southern Corp. must pay off $400 million worth of bonds to investors – 100 years from now.
  • Johnson & Johnson will pay back $4.4 billion worth of debt at just 0.7% interest – quite a deal considering the core inflation rate is over 3%.

Some financial experts are steering their clients clear of corporate bonds altogether, largely because they see inflation going up for the forseeable future.

As Barclays Capital points out, the yield for corporate bonds is below 4%, for the second time in two decades. So bondholders will lose money by the time their bonds mature – not such a great investment.

What’s your take on corporate bonds? Share your opinion below.

Tags: , , , , ,

One Response to “These may be the junkiest of junk bonds”

  1. e j boyson Says:

    Why buy Corporates @ 4% when once can buy decent Municipals @ 5%/6%/7%?

Leave a Reply


advertisement

Whitepapers



advertisement

See what readers are saying...

  • Siegel has no Clue: Really Jeremy? 25% undervalued? When have you ever said they were expensive? Maybe you should check with GMO who has ...
  • David Pickett: QE3 might balance the budget while Congress does the political theater dance, some new sort of a Greek Tragedy!...
  • ethan: I'm not sure if I'd agree with going another round, but as you stated: "Unemployment is rising. Manufacturing is down. I...
  • Mark Aras: Let's try to NOT be creative by repeating last year's use of the term "qualitative easing" when everybody already unders...
  • e j boyson: Why buy Corporates @ 4% when once can buy decent Municipals @ 5%/6%/7%?...
  • Mark Thompson: In your article, do you mean to use the word quantitative as opposed to qualitative?...







a